{
  "id": 5348431,
  "name": "Henry Himsteadt, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Himsteadt v. State",
  "decision_date": "1925-01-29",
  "docket_number": "No. 579",
  "first_page": "60",
  "last_page": "60",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 60"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 117,
    "char_count": 1351,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.507,
    "sha256": "bb5caabd80b98f6fdd7e7dc0a53505293f0afe5fe0c216d7033988841c9fe40d",
    "simhash": "1:7b61a7be3559888b",
    "word_count": 228
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:23.872152+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Henry Himsteadt, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Phillips\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nHenry Himsteadt, the claimant, files his declaration asking for an award in the sum of $650.00 claiming that is the value of straw burned on his premises in the year of 1921 by order of the Agricultural Department of the State of Illinois in the quarantined district embracing his lands and the lands of many other farmers in which they were quarantined against an infection known as \u201cFlag Smut.\u201d\nIn that same year the said department ordered his straw and all other straw in the infected district to be burned, which accordingly was done, and his claim is so filed.\nIn the case of Joseph Maze, against the State of Illinois, in Case No. 21, an opinion was filed on the 28th day of January, 1925, embracing the same facts as the case at bar.\nThe opinion is written fully in the last above named report and states our entire reasons for the opinion expressed therein, and the same governs in this case and for the reasons \u00ab expressed in the case heretofore mentioned. The claim is therefore disallowed, demurrer is sustained and the case dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Phillips"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Turner, Holder & Burlington, for claimant.",
      "Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General ; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 579\nHenry Himsteadt, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed January 29, 1925.\nTurner, Holder & Burlington, for claimant.\nEdward J. Brundage, Attorney General ; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0060-01",
  "first_page_order": 82,
  "last_page_order": 82
}