{
  "id": 5346986,
  "name": "Anna Klitzke, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Klitzke v. State",
  "decision_date": "1925-04-16",
  "docket_number": "No. 7",
  "first_page": "69",
  "last_page": "69",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 69"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 146,
    "char_count": 1604,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.524,
    "sha256": "80d0007cd3a4a1790377940ce40f11b28372ad5c0857ee0bdcbdb0d38db7e8d7",
    "simhash": "1:622c569de34daeb5",
    "word_count": 285
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:23.872152+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Anna Klitzke, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nIt appears from the claimant\u2019s statement that a lease was entered into by the said claimant and the Illinois National Guard for the period of one year from May 1,1915, which was a continuance of a former arrangement.\nThe rental for this particular period was to be $70.00 per month for a period of one year. It further appears by the statement that the guard occupied said premises during said period until August 31, 1915, and paid rent up until that time upon that date or before rent was paid as agreed, but did not pay rent for the balance of period of eight months.\nThe claimant makes an additional claim for $70.87 for repairs.\nThe defendant comes in and urges the Statute of Limitations, and this court in this claim in following its language;\nIn Jackson v. State of Illinois, 4 Court of Claims, 333, this court said:\n\u201cIt is also the duty of this court to do justice to the people of the State and that wherein a claim is hot brought forth within a reasonable time, it should not be allowed.\u201d\nIt is the opinion of this court at this time that the claim brought should at least be within the rules prescribed by law. In the first place that the people may know their tax burdens and the second place so that evidence would not become stale or lost, and, therefore, for the reasons assigned, the claim is denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Tatge & Tatge, for claimant.",
      "Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 7\nAnna Klitzke, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed April 16, 1925.\nTatge & Tatge, for claimant.\nEdward J. Brundage, Attorney General; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0069-01",
  "first_page_order": 91,
  "last_page_order": 91
}