{
  "id": 5348524,
  "name": "Edwin O. Linden, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Linden v. State",
  "decision_date": "1925-05-01",
  "docket_number": "No. 785",
  "first_page": "150",
  "last_page": "150",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 150"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 83,
    "char_count": 795,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.538,
    "sha256": "fa624a97884c826e079ffa61d31b2fc8008aef7604dd17f08181de8b47707151",
    "simhash": "1:b193dba2be09de9d",
    "word_count": 130
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:23.872152+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Edwin O. Linden, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis id a claim for soldier\u2019s compensation. The State, by its Attorney General, comes and files its statement denying the legal or equitable right of the claimant and alleges that this court is without jurisdiction, owing to the fact that the intention of the bonus act was to vest the service recognition board with exclusive jurisdiction and pass upon and finally dispose of all claims filed under that act.\nIt is the opinion of the court that this contention is correct.\nTherefore, the claim is denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Lee W. Carter, for claimant.",
      "Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General ; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 785\nEdwin O. Linden, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed May 1, 1925.\nLee W. Carter, for claimant.\nEdward J. Brundage, Attorney General ; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0150-01",
  "first_page_order": 172,
  "last_page_order": 172
}