{
  "id": 5353599,
  "name": "Samuel J. Mixter, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mixter v. State",
  "decision_date": "1925-05-01",
  "docket_number": "No. 886",
  "first_page": "185",
  "last_page": "185",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 185"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 86,
    "char_count": 890,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.528,
    "sha256": "593f940dda03b29d0b96583bb23ef45be40b7986cef82218c17734242a509d3b",
    "simhash": "1:08784e84b4306e1a",
    "word_count": 152
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:23.872152+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Samuel J. Mixter, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\n. This case is an application by claimant, Samuel J. Mixter, for refund of inheritance taxes $1,141.45, the ampunt he claims to be due him on re-assessment and by a finding of the county court on such re-assessment, with interest from April 24, 1912, at the rate of 3% per annum.\nIt is evident to the court that there is now due claimant the sum of $1139.74 with 3% per annum from April 24, 1912, and to the allowance of this sum with interest the Attorney General files his written consent. The court accordingly awards the claimant the sum of $1,139.74 with interest at 3% from April 24, 1912.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Thomas S. Ward, for claimant.",
      "\u2022 Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Frank R Eagle-ton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 886\nSamuel J. Mixter, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed May 1, 1925.\nThomas S. Ward, for claimant.\n\u2022 Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Frank R Eagle-ton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0185-01",
  "first_page_order": 207,
  "last_page_order": 207
}