{
  "id": 5351553,
  "name": "County of LaSalle, State of Illinois, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "County of LaSalle v. State",
  "decision_date": "1925-05-01",
  "docket_number": "No. 894",
  "first_page": "190",
  "last_page": "190",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 190"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 88,
    "char_count": 921,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.531,
    "sha256": "c8ba03f9a86c7e6a56675fb733c6e36fab8a5a00be998f7f9be94f4072ec39ad",
    "simhash": "1:f90af1be884d3eb8",
    "word_count": 159
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:23.872152+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "County of LaSalle, State of Illinois, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Leech\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis is a claim for damages sustained by claimant, on its premises located a short distance west of the city of Ottawa, and known as the \u201cLaSalle County Poor Farm\u201d, or \u201cHome\u201d, by reason of the overflow of a canal owned by the State of Illinois; said damage having occurred on or about September 7, 1924, and as a result of which the crops raised on said farm were destroyed, the reasonable value of said crops being $3,500.00.\nThe demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, is, as a matter of law, sustained.\nWe award claimant the sum of $3,500.00, on the grounds of equity and social justice.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Leech"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Lee O \u2019Neil Browne, for claimant.",
      "Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; S. S. DuHamel, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 894\nCounty of LaSalle, State of Illinois, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed May 1, 1925.\nLee O \u2019Neil Browne, for claimant.\nOscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; S. S. DuHamel, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0190-01",
  "first_page_order": 212,
  "last_page_order": 212
}