{
  "id": 5353405,
  "name": "W. E. Crosiar, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Crosiar v. State",
  "decision_date": "1925-05-01",
  "docket_number": "No. 920",
  "first_page": "206",
  "last_page": "206",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 206"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 80,
    "char_count": 815,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.513,
    "sha256": "a210c213f4ca34fba2bcf2ea4bc9689648b4046044e989ffdf22353b89a6b090",
    "simhash": "1:127a8c3fba6ba7b4",
    "word_count": 133
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:23.872152+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. E. Crosiar, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis is an action brought to recover for work performed on certain State buildings and materials furnished. It appears that the Department of Public Works and Buildings carefully examined the claim and have consented to its payment. The amount that is agreed upon as being due by both the claimant and the Department of Public Works and Buildings is $2,500.00, and it further appears that the Attorney General consents to an award in that amount.\nTherefore this court recommends that the claim be allowed in the sum ,of $2,500.00.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "C. R. Miller, for claimant.",
      "Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; S. S. DuHamel, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 920\nW. E. Crosiar, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed May 1, 1925.\nC. R. Miller, for claimant.\nOscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; S. S. DuHamel, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0206-01",
  "first_page_order": 228,
  "last_page_order": 228
}