{
  "id": 5354179,
  "name": "The Consolidated Assurance Company, Ltd., Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Consolidated Assurance Co. v. State",
  "decision_date": "1927-01-19",
  "docket_number": "No. 1048",
  "first_page": "266",
  "last_page": "266",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 266"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 84,
    "char_count": 847,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.542,
    "sha256": "c9f8cc6d181695272b674ed1e9cdad1202a3f3d2e8aea83fe0f0268c316bb31c",
    "simhash": "1:d6a2f23dd3166e3c",
    "word_count": 141
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:23.872152+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Consolidated Assurance Company, Ltd., Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Thomas\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis is a claim for $200.00 refund of privilege tax erroneously paid to the Department of Trade and Commerce by claimant for the year 1921.\nNo defense of the claim is interposed by or on behalf of the State, and the Attorney General filed a statement and attached thereto as an exhibit a letter from the Director of the Department of Trade and Commerce in which he admits the overpayment was due to a clerical error and that the claim should be allowed. Accordingly, an award is allowed in favor of claimant in the sum of $200.00.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Thomas"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hagedorn & Co., for claimant.",
      "Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1048\nThe Consolidated Assurance Company, Ltd., Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed January 19, 1927.\nHagedorn & Co., for claimant.\nOscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0266-01",
  "first_page_order": 288,
  "last_page_order": 288
}
