{
  "id": 5348322,
  "name": "William M. Rossell, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rossell v. State",
  "decision_date": "1927-03-10",
  "docket_number": "No. 1124",
  "first_page": "307",
  "last_page": "307",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "5 Ill. Ct. Cl. 307"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 121,
    "char_count": 1276,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.519,
    "sha256": "e35fbbe7a56c5bcb388b1dfefe73eb59e16f3b81cedd72ae90096f4b13b3e511",
    "simhash": "1:cd24399e216d9e29",
    "word_count": 213
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:18:23.872152+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William M. Rossell, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Leech\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nWilliam M. Eossell presents a claim against the State on account of a deficiency in salary, allotted to the chief inspector in the Division of Private .Employment Agencies, in the Department of Labor for deputy hire, said claimant being a deputy in said service. It appears that the General Assembly in making the appropriation for the salaries in question, did not take into consideration that the law enacted contains a provision as follows: \u201cIf the deputy inspector has served or hereafter serves more than one year, $100 shall be added to his salary for each year of service until a maximum salary of $3000 is reached,\u201d and that no allowance for such increase in salary is made in the law.\nThe Attorney General of the State of Illinois has filed a demurrer, which is sustained, as a matter of law.\nGeorge B. Arnold, Director of Labor of the State of Illinois, has recommended that this deficiency be awarded to the employee.\nWe accordingly award to the claimant the sum of $400.00.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Leech"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Harry Smitz, for claimant.",
      "Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Merrill F. Wehmhoff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1124\nWilliam M. Rossell, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed March 10, 1927.\nHarry Smitz, for claimant.\nOscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Merrill F. Wehmhoff, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0307-01",
  "first_page_order": 329,
  "last_page_order": 329
}