{
  "id": 2790704,
  "name": "W. F. Barton, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Barton v. State",
  "decision_date": "1928-01-11",
  "docket_number": "No. 1092",
  "first_page": "50",
  "last_page": "50",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 50"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 60,
    "char_count": 519,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.512,
    "sha256": "7b1a5f398ad29b91971d553662da43e619e2dbb4ae2b3d2b7b1e86c3df79fc12",
    "simhash": "1:96934e97901ceea1",
    "word_count": 86
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:41.892765+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. F. Barton, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThis cause coming on to be heard upon motion of claimant that the above entitled cause be dismissed, and it appearing that there is no reason why said cause should not be dismissed,\nIt is therefore considered by the court that said cause be, and the- same is hereby dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "B. L. Kirk, for claimant.",
      "Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Frank It. Eagle-ton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1092\nW. F. Barton, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed January 11, 1928.\nB. L. Kirk, for claimant.\nOscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Frank It. Eagle-ton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0050-01",
  "first_page_order": 76,
  "last_page_order": 76
}