{
  "id": 2804328,
  "name": "The Lunkenheimer Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lunkenheimer Co. v. State",
  "decision_date": "1928-10-24",
  "docket_number": "No. 1217",
  "first_page": "98",
  "last_page": "98",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 98"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 80,
    "char_count": 832,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.547,
    "sha256": "8c25e3c01f2d4d2cd7dc5b805808cdb114d2eea8fd97c8b5deb868590ae78000",
    "simhash": "1:51735ec78166baaa",
    "word_count": 137
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:41.892765+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Lunkenheimer Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThe claimant, an Ohio corporation, seeks to recover on account of franchise taxes and initial, fees alleged to be wrongfully collected by the Secretary of State.\nThis court is of the opinion that claimant had an adequate remedy at law in courts of general jurisdiction as expressed by this court in the opinion filed in the case of the Moline Plow Company v. State of Illinois, and in the case of Geo. P. Ide & Co., Inc., v. State of Illinois, No. 1215.,\nTherefore it is recommended by this court that this claim be disallowed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Graham & Graham, for claimant.",
      "Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; David J. Kadyk, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1217\nThe Lunkenheimer Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed October 24, 1928.\nGraham & Graham, for claimant.\nOscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; David J. Kadyk, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0098-01",
  "first_page_order": 124,
  "last_page_order": 124
}