{
  "id": 2802502,
  "name": "The Acme Rubber Manufacturing Co., Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Acme Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. State",
  "decision_date": "1929-04-25",
  "docket_number": "No. 1250",
  "first_page": "204",
  "last_page": "204",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 204"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 95,
    "char_count": 989,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.526,
    "sha256": "8c53e77805e352fc638826af05bbd0440a8a839da15a69813f3b9c1919c4bf66",
    "simhash": "1:40334e9f2905e0e0",
    "word_count": 166
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:41.892765+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Acme Rubber Manufacturing Co., Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity\ndelivered the opinion of the \u25a0court:\nThis is a claim filed to recover for certain franchise tax alleged to have been wrongfully collected by the Secretary of State.\"\nAs heretofore held by this court the claimant had an adequate remedy in the courts of general jurisdiction and for a further reasoning this court cites the opinion filed by this court on Oct. 24th, 1928, Geo. P. Ide & Co., Inc., v. State of Illinois, No. 1215.\nThe Attorney General comes and defends and denies the right of claimant to recover.\nThis court is of the opinion that the law and the facts set out and as set forth and discussed in the Ide case controls.\nTherefore it is recommended by this court that said claim be disallowed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Coburn, Kearney & Coburn, for claimant.",
      "Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; David J. Kadyk, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1250\nThe Acme Rubber Manufacturing Co., Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed April 25, 1929.\nCoburn, Kearney & Coburn, for claimant.\nOscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; David J. Kadyk, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0204-01",
  "first_page_order": 230,
  "last_page_order": 230
}