{
  "id": 2797992,
  "name": "E. E. Huckaba, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Huckaba v. State",
  "decision_date": "1929-05-09",
  "docket_number": "No. 1382",
  "first_page": "268",
  "last_page": "268",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 268"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 97,
    "char_count": 926,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.536,
    "sha256": "59de371c4b6870650d3756113d3794fd6ba99d8d74c51c5ae88a34367e25e000",
    "simhash": "1:d078eb9b0bbd5ec0",
    "word_count": 164
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:41.892765+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "E. E. Huckaba, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Leech\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis is a claim for damages resulting from an alleged purposed change in the location of State Eoute No. 11 in front of claimant\u2019s farm.\nWe are of the opinion that the claim for damages of this matter would not lie against the State of Illinois even if the route was changed on the theory that the State has the right to change any part of said hard road system at any time it deems advisable. The claimant on cross-examination in answer to this question; \u201cYou have not been damaged any, as yet, because of any change or contemplated change, have you?\u201d his answer was, \u201cI have not been hurt any yet, no.\u201d\nThe claim is denied and the cause dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Leech"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "E. E. Huckaba, pro se.",
      "Oscab E. Cablstbom, Attorney General; Frank E. Eagle-ton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1382\nE. E. Huckaba, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed May 9, 1929.\nE. E. Huckaba, pro se.\nOscab E. Cablstbom, Attorney General; Frank E. Eagle-ton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0268-01",
  "first_page_order": 294,
  "last_page_order": 294
}