{
  "id": 2795033,
  "name": "William M. Scanlan, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Scanlan v. State",
  "decision_date": "1930-11-12",
  "docket_number": "No. 1579",
  "first_page": "451",
  "last_page": "452",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 451"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 72,
    "char_count": 752,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.558,
    "sha256": "fcb5ec2a4eebed5c4c5c89b98cae0574ff773f510b53cce123a1fa11f2ae5a5e",
    "simhash": "1:10f777fd7d08beaa",
    "word_count": 122
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:41.892765+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William M. Scanlan, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice Clabity\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis is a claim for back salary for acting as Industrial Officer and Chairman of the Industrial Commission of the State of Illinois. It appears that there is no objection on the part of the defendant as to the legality of the claim and that the amount claimed $562.50, is admitted to be mathematically correct in a letter from the State Auditor to the Attorney General.\nTherefore the court recommends that the claimant be allowed the sum of $562.50.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice Clabity"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Scanlan & Massieon, for claimant.",
      "Oscab E. Cablstbom, Attorney General; Boy D. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1579\nWilliam M. Scanlan, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed November 12, 1930.\nScanlan & Massieon, for claimant.\nOscab E. Cablstbom, Attorney General; Boy D. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0451-01",
  "first_page_order": 477,
  "last_page_order": 478
}