{
  "id": 2806777,
  "name": "Arthur Boyd, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Boyd v. State",
  "decision_date": "1931-04-16",
  "docket_number": "No. 1652",
  "first_page": "510",
  "last_page": "510",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 510"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 105,
    "char_count": 1057,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.55,
    "sha256": "63376e058bfbcb62556f8e6a38a8636cc59f56cda0729181aad45aeb20ace577",
    "simhash": "1:e20aa2633d16e691",
    "word_count": 184
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:41.892765+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Arthur Boyd, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mj\\ Justice Thomas\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nOn October 26,1929, while employed as a workman for the State in repairs being made by the State to the Anna State Hospital claimant received an injury to his left eye. The injury arose out of and in the course of his employment. His physician\u2019s charges were paid by the State. The evidence shows he has suffered a loss of three fourths of the sight of the eye. At the time of the injury the State was engaged in an enterprise declared by Clause 1 of Article 3 of the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act to be extra hazardous and is, therefore, liable to pay claimant the compensation provided in that Act to be paid a workman for such injury. The amount due claimant, under the evidence, is $810.00. It is therefore ordered that claimant be and he is allowed an award of $810.00.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mj\\ Justice Thomas"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Glenn O. Brown, for claimant.",
      "Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Frank B. Eagle-ton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1652\nArthur Boyd, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed April 16, 1931.\nGlenn O. Brown, for claimant.\nOscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Frank B. Eagle-ton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0510-01",
  "first_page_order": 536,
  "last_page_order": 536
}