{
  "id": 2801475,
  "name": "Holland Butter Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Holland Butter Co. v. State",
  "decision_date": "1931-04-16",
  "docket_number": "No. 1667",
  "first_page": "512",
  "last_page": "513",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 512"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 79,
    "char_count": 771,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.551,
    "sha256": "104e74a8ff9fddbb717857dd6472ab7b9bfb400a9d90c23d8c21de45506fd1d0",
    "simhash": "1:18a2468d48c74a92",
    "word_count": 122
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:41.892765+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Holland Butter Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chibe Justice Clarity\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis is a claim for refund of corporate franchise tax in the sum of Forty-nine 17/100 ($49.17) Dollars, for period commencing July 1st, 1930 and ending June 30th, 1931. It appears by stipulation that .said corporation ceased doing business after July 10th, 1930. It is recommended by the Attorney General that claim for refund as above set forth be allowed.\nTherefore it is recommended by this court that claimant be allowed the sum of Forty-nine 17/100 ($49.17) Dollars.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chibe Justice Clarity"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "George H. White, for claimant.",
      "Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Carl I. Dietz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1667\nHolland Butter Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed April 16, 1931.\nGeorge H. White, for claimant.\nOscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Carl I. Dietz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0512-01",
  "first_page_order": 538,
  "last_page_order": 539
}