{
  "id": 2804137,
  "name": "Frank Hartkorn, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hartkorn v. State",
  "decision_date": "1930-01-15",
  "docket_number": "No. 1362",
  "first_page": "515",
  "last_page": "516",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 515"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 129,
    "char_count": 1664,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.558,
    "sha256": "e26c4cfef0f1560bf72ef883f62ced019245ce06ac1ee03204b49be4ac5e4fd5",
    "simhash": "1:c340074b9a29dcf9",
    "word_count": 266
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:41.892765+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Frank Hartkorn, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nIt appears that the basis of this claim is that the property of the claimant, was damaged on account of the building of a hard road in front of claimant\u2019s premises, that on account of such improvement, water was diverted onto the claimant\u2019s property.\nWe are of the opinion from all of the evidence in the case, that there is no material damage to claimant\u2019s premises, on account of the construction of this road. On the contrary, the court believes, that hard roads generally add value to property, and that the increased value of the premises in question, would greatly compensate the claimant for any inconvenience that might be occasioned by the improvement in question.\nTherefore, the court recommends that the claim be disallowed.\nOn May 28, 1930, upon motion of claimant an oral order was entered granting a rehearing for the purpose of taking additional testimony to determine the amount of damages.\nOn May 14,1931, the following additional modified opinion was filed:\nIt appears from additional evidence taken that claimant suffered damages by reason of hard road construction on S. B. I. Route No. 7. The Attorney General comes and stipulates and agrees that claimant suffered damages in the sum of $2,500.00.\nThe court, therefore, recommends that claimant be allowed $2,500.00.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity delivered the opinion of the court:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mills, Richardson & Helffrich, for claimant.",
      "Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Carl I. Dietz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1362\nFrank Hartkorn, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed January 15, 1930.\nRehearing granted May 28, 1930.\nModified opinion filed May 14, 1931.\nMills, Richardson & Helffrich, for claimant.\nOscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Carl I. Dietz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0515-01",
  "first_page_order": 541,
  "last_page_order": 542
}