{
  "id": 2800478,
  "name": "C. E. Carson Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "C. E. Carson Co. v. State",
  "decision_date": "1931-05-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 1486",
  "first_page": "520",
  "last_page": "520",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 520"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 107,
    "char_count": 1233,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.569,
    "sha256": "8dfb71f9bbe39ad2e7c8b908dbb074554f6e822de731dd177997214360c67da5",
    "simhash": "1:2112e73f9bee5a15",
    "word_count": 210
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:41.892765+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "C. E. Carson Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Thomas\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThe claimant files its claim for $73,319.34 for delays in completing its contract with the State of Illinois for the construction of Sections 16, 17 and 18 of \u00a1Hard Road Bond Issue Route No. 18 after it had entered upon performance by reason of a change of route made necessary by litigation forcing the State to change the route as originally platted and claimant had the contract to construct a concrete highway.\nIt is stipulated and agreed between the claimant and the legal representatives of the State of Illinois that the claimant was damaged in the sum of $48,496.53 on account of the. delays caused by litigation over the right of way which the State had not procured before the letting of the contract by the State of Illinois to complete the construction of the concrete road over said Sections 16,17 and 18 of S. B. I. Route No. 18.\nOn the request of the legal representatives of the State the court allows an award for $48,496.53.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Thomas"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Justus Chancellor, for claimant.",
      "Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Carl I. Dietz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1486\nC. E. Carson Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed May 14, 1931.\nJustus Chancellor, for claimant.\nOscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Carl I. Dietz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0520-01",
  "first_page_order": 546,
  "last_page_order": 546
}