{
  "id": 2790158,
  "name": "George Kramer, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Kramer v. State",
  "decision_date": "1931-05-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 1566",
  "first_page": "531",
  "last_page": "531",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 531"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 74,
    "char_count": 680,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.557,
    "sha256": "cdf92b922eb6bed6736e858c0e7641c406cd87a2b408aa34aa63a4348a288966",
    "simhash": "1:ff8b3d14aac6feaa",
    "word_count": 115
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:41.892765+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "George Kramer, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Thomas\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThe claimant files this claim for damages to dwelling house on account of the construction of routes No. 40 and No. 78 of the hard road system, in front of his residence. Counsel for claimant and the Attorney General for the State have agreed that the claimant is damaged in the sum of $600.00.\nTherefore, an award for the sum of $600.00 is awarded claimant.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Thomas"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "C. W. Middlekauff And Fred S. Smith, for claimant.",
      "Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Boy D. Johnson and Carl I. Dietz, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1566\nGeorge Kramer, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed May 14, 1931.\nC. W. Middlekauff And Fred S. Smith, for claimant.\nOscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Boy D. Johnson and Carl I. Dietz, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0531-01",
  "first_page_order": 557,
  "last_page_order": 557
}