{
  "id": 2799873,
  "name": "Harry F. Hamlin, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hamlin v. State",
  "decision_date": "1931-05-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 1613",
  "first_page": "536",
  "last_page": "537",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 536"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 72,
    "char_count": 728,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.553,
    "sha256": "6c4bf36d621103b549174570eeee860dd9b79a1e28f46f7eb87b1bec9db0c3c0",
    "simhash": "1:80b02d05222c9cb1",
    "word_count": 121
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:41.892765+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Harry F. Hamlin, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nIt appears that claimant desires to recover for the loss of cattle known as re-acting cattle. Two animals were disposed of according to claimant. It appears that the tests and the destruction of the animals were not authorized by the State of Illinois and according to the Attorney General a voluntary act and loss on the part of the claimant.\nIn view of all the facts and circumstances disclosed in this case, the court disallows the claim.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Harry F. Hamlin, pro se.",
      "Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Carl I. Dietz, ' Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1613\nHarry F. Hamlin, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed May 14, 1931.\nHarry F. Hamlin, pro se.\nOscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Carl I. Dietz, ' Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0536-02",
  "first_page_order": 562,
  "last_page_order": 563
}