{
  "id": 2805182,
  "name": "Edgar J. Mayer, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mayer v. State",
  "decision_date": "1931-05-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 1627",
  "first_page": "541",
  "last_page": "541",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 541"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 81,
    "char_count": 824,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.544,
    "sha256": "5a19b018e86aca3e77f5cf777add440e12d42651aa9596615b8835b8d1782ada",
    "simhash": "1:80788f31ec229eb9",
    "word_count": 131
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:41.892765+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Edgar J. Mayer, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis is a claim for personal injury sustained by claimant while he was employed by the State of Illinois, through its Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Highways.\nThere is no contention but that the employment was extra hazardous and the Attorney General appearing in open court recommends that there is a liability on the part of the State of Illinois and that under the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act claimant should be allowed the sum of $433.75.\nThereupon, the court recommends that claimant be allowed $433.75.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice Clarity"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Clark, Young & Bull, for claimant.",
      "Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Carl I. Dietz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1627\nEdgar J. Mayer, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed May 14, 1931.\nClark, Young & Bull, for claimant.\nOscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; Carl I. Dietz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0541-01",
  "first_page_order": 567,
  "last_page_order": 567
}