{
  "id": 2802480,
  "name": "Boyd McCane, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "McCane v. State",
  "decision_date": "1931-05-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 1691",
  "first_page": "559",
  "last_page": "559",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 559"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 72,
    "char_count": 729,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.549,
    "sha256": "96c368c69697818e4c3bc2db6256aaa72fa425f16a16a16fda957933efa64b1b",
    "simhash": "1:daf2bb71340d4ed8",
    "word_count": 113
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:56:41.892765+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Boyd McCane, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice\nClabity delivered the opinion of the court:\nThis is a claim for additional compensation for services rendered the State of Illinois by the claimant in closing up of a National Guard Unit at Metropolis, Illinois. It appears that claimant performed patriotic and extraordinary services. There is no objection on the part of the Attorney General in the allowance of One Hundred ($100.00) Dollars.\nTherefore the court recommends that claimant he allowed the sum of One Hundred ($100.00) Dollars.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Feed Smith, for claimant.",
      "Oscae E. Caelsteom, Attorney General; Gael I. Dietz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1691\nBoyd McCane, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed May 14, 1931.\nFeed Smith, for claimant.\nOscae E. Caelsteom, Attorney General; Gael I. Dietz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0559-01",
  "first_page_order": 585,
  "last_page_order": 585
}
