{
  "id": 2799153,
  "name": "Kenneth Lyle Clayton, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Clayton v. State",
  "decision_date": "1931-11-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 1031",
  "first_page": "19",
  "last_page": "19",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 19"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 80,
    "char_count": 654,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.54,
    "sha256": "c0ac0472cce0c3954921f1e28583aa4939c82290ec34881aa276b0e03cbcfe38",
    "simhash": "1:d6c62aeab1566e21",
    "word_count": 114
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:19:26.187352+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Kenneth Lyle Clayton, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nNow comes Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General, and makes his motion for dismissal, pursuant to an order to show cause entered by this court on the 8th day of September, A. D. 1931, wherein the claimant was ordered to show cause on or before November 3, 1931, why this ease should not be dismissed for want of prosecution.\nAnd it appearing to the court that cause has not been shown by claimant in accordance with said order, it is hereby ordered that the claim be dismissed without an order and the case stricken from the docket.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1031 \u2014\nKenneth Lyle Clayton, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed November 5, 1931."
  },
  "file_name": "0019-01",
  "first_page_order": 39,
  "last_page_order": 39
}