{
  "id": 2798595,
  "name": "Lake Erie & Western Railroad Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. State",
  "decision_date": "1932-12-05",
  "docket_number": "No. 553",
  "first_page": "102",
  "last_page": "102",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 102"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 59,
    "char_count": 499,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.505,
    "sha256": "4fbaca80d9c710423ac09b29c30e1d67bb242feeef343a315fe147ae06edfbff",
    "simhash": "1:1eb44c15224cae0a",
    "word_count": 86
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:19:26.187352+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Lake Erie & Western Railroad Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam:\nThe cause coming on to be heard upon motion of claimant filed on June 12, 1932, to dismiss the above entitled claim, and the court being fully advised in the premises, and it appearing there is no reason why said case should not be dismissed, it is, therefore, considered by the court that said case be and the same is hereby dismissed upon motion of claimant.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 553 \u2014\nLake Erie & Western Railroad Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed December 5, 1932."
  },
  "file_name": "0102-02",
  "first_page_order": 122,
  "last_page_order": 122
}