{
  "id": 2800617,
  "name": "John Kranc, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Kranc v. State",
  "decision_date": "1933-05-15",
  "docket_number": "No. 1732",
  "first_page": "180",
  "last_page": "181",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 180"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 158,
    "char_count": 2414,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.527,
    "sha256": "fa19f4a84489824ecdc6e15080fd9e44a581cb3b5258d0341afe6374a34ce705",
    "simhash": "1:c43d27065022e703",
    "word_count": 395
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:19:26.187352+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John Kranc, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Vause\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis is a claim for compensation arising from accidental injuries alleged to. have been suffered by the claimant while an employee of the State of Illinois.\nThe record shows that the alleged injury was suffered on the 24th day of June, 1929. Claim for compensation for these injuries was filed in this court on March 4th, 1931. The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the.claim because application for compensation was not filed within the time required by the terms of the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act.\nChapter 37, Paragraph 432, Smith-Hurd\u2019s Statutes, 1931, defines the powers and duties of this court. This section provides among other things the following:\n\u201c(6) To hear and determine the liability of the State for accidental injuries or death suffered in the course of employment by any employee of the State, such determination to be made in accordance with the rules prescribed in the act commonly called the \"Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act\u2019 the Industrial Commission being hereby relieved of any duty relative thereto.\u201d\nUnder the power and duty granted by the foregoing section, the determination of the liability of the State in this class of cases must be made in accordance with the rules prescribed in the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act. Section 24 of the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act provides among other things:\n\u201cProvided that in any case unless application for compensation is filed with the Industrial Commission within one year after the date of the injury or within one year after the date of the last payment of compensation the right to file such application shall be barred.\u201d\nThis limitation is binding upon this court in the determination of the liability of the State for accidental injuries under Paragraph 432, of Chapter 37, above quoted.\nThere is no claim made in this case that any compensation has been paid by the State on account of this injury and the record affirmatively shows that application for compensation was filed with this court more than one year after the date of the alleged injury.\nThe motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the claim is therefore allowed and the claim is ordered dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Vause"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William B. McCabe, for claimant.",
      "Otto Keener, Attorney General; Carl I. Dietz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1732 \u2014\nJohn Kranc, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed May 15, 1933.\nWilliam B. McCabe, for claimant.\nOtto Keener, Attorney General; Carl I. Dietz, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0180-01",
  "first_page_order": 202,
  "last_page_order": 203
}