{
  "id": 6045672,
  "name": "Carl Littlejohn vs. State of Illinois",
  "name_abbreviation": "Littlejohn v. State",
  "decision_date": "1932-05-03",
  "docket_number": "No. 1758",
  "first_page": "156b",
  "last_page": "156b",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 156b"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 57,
    "char_count": 544,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.517,
    "sha256": "037053d116fc7bbf8faa6ec098975190bfd0da037a3b175b9773783e046e55ae",
    "simhash": "1:18b4366e10a9bc91",
    "word_count": 90
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:19:26.187352+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Carl Littlejohn vs. State of Illinois."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Thomas\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nAfter a careful consideration of the petition for a rehearing in the above case we find nothing in the petition that was not carefully considered and passed on by the court in the original opinion in this case.\nThe decision heretofore rendered in this case is therefore \u25a0 affirmed and the petition for rehearing is denied.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Thomas"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General and Carl Dietz, Assistant Attorney General, for the State."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1758.)\nFiled May 3, 1932.\nCarl Littlejohn vs. State of Illinois.\nOscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General and Carl Dietz, Assistant Attorney General, for the State."
  },
  "file_name": "156b-01",
  "first_page_order": 178,
  "last_page_order": 178
}