{
  "id": 2811189,
  "name": "Waukegan Clinic, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Waukegan Clinic v. State",
  "decision_date": "1934-01-09",
  "docket_number": "No. 1682",
  "first_page": "47",
  "last_page": "48",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 47"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 121,
    "char_count": 1323,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.538,
    "sha256": "207e6f0b55070da270d0d3bfb5b9c17aa82a9019fcd58b38aef1c609f8c1cba8",
    "simhash": "1:466f50252b11fb78",
    "word_count": 212
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:36:37.717265+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Waukegan Clinic, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Yantis\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis claim is for medical attention given by claimant to Elzie Barnfield, an employee of the Division of Highways, State of Illinois, for an injury received May 1, 1929. No disagreement of facts appear. The' services in question were apparently accorded by claimant to the injured employee in the regular course of duty and at the request of superiors in the Highway Department. An allowance of the claim has been recommended by the Division of Highways. A statement of the latter in the record states: \u201cThe bill was not paid previously, inasmuch as the accident occurred shortly before the expiration of the previous appropriation, and before the bill could be passed on, the time limit for bills incurred under that appropriation had expired\u201d. Allowance of the claim is recommended by .the Attorney General\u2019s Office.\nIt is apparent that the claim would have been paid if it could have cleared the department in time for the appropriation then expiring.\nThe claim is therefore allowed and payment recommended in the sum of Twenty Dollars ($20.00).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Yantis"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Waukegan Clinic, pro se.",
      "Otto Keener, Attorney General; John Kasserman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 1682\nWaukegan Clinic, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed January 9, 1934.\nWaukegan Clinic, pro se.\nOtto Keener, Attorney General; John Kasserman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0047-01",
  "first_page_order": 69,
  "last_page_order": 70
}