{
  "id": 2808011,
  "name": "Evangelical Deaconess Hospital of Lincoln, Illinois, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Evangelical Deaconess Hospital of Lincoln v. State",
  "decision_date": "1934-12-11",
  "docket_number": "No. 2411",
  "first_page": "291",
  "last_page": "292",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 291"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 72,
    "char_count": 720,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.552,
    "sha256": "5237731c7854ff279e6bb13bf10b4189ee715ee97f02175060499cef9ee88b02",
    "simhash": "1:4ba22afd6a2a9670",
    "word_count": 115
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:36:37.717265+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Evangelical Deaconess Hospital of Lincoln, Illinois, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Yantis\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThe facts in the case of Evangelical Deaconess Hospital are fully set forth in the case of Dr. Charles J. Hutton, No. 2407, decided at the present term of this court and the reasons for the allowance of an award are therein stated. To save repetition reference is, therefore, made to that cause.\nAn award is herein allowed in favor of Deaconess Hospital of Lincoln, Illinois, in the sum of $172.67.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Yantis"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William M. Scanlan, for claimant.",
      "Otto Keener, Attorney General; John Kasserman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 2411\nEvangelical Deaconess Hospital of Lincoln, Illinois, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed December 11, 1934.\nWilliam M. Scanlan, for claimant.\nOtto Keener, Attorney General; John Kasserman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0291-01",
  "first_page_order": 313,
  "last_page_order": 314
}