{
  "id": 2807313,
  "name": "Dr. Charles J. Hutton, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hutton v. State",
  "decision_date": "1934-12-11",
  "docket_number": "No. 2407",
  "first_page": "310",
  "last_page": "313",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 310"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 398,
    "char_count": 7034,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.555,
    "sha256": "a67d989789de8afbba524170870b23232c246ad93967ef41384af087a9fea06c",
    "simhash": "1:94be23a3d9c077ac",
    "word_count": 1061
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:36:37.717265+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Dr. Charles J. Hutton, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Me. Justice Tantis\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nClaimant seeks settlement for medical services furnished to William L. Dingier of Peru, Illinois.\nFour other claims g\u2019rowing out of the same circumstances have been filed, i. e.: Dr. George E. Kirby vs. State, No. 2408; Dr. E. C. Gaffney vs. State, No. 2409; Dr. N. A. Balding vs. State, No. 2410 and Evangelical Deaconess Hospital vs. State, No. 2411, and to save repetition, reference will be made in the opinions of those cases to this case.\nWilliam L. Dingier was employed by the State of Illinois as an automobile investigator and on October 17, 1931, in traveling the territory in which his employment necessitated his going, he was riding a motorcycle with a side-car attached enroute from Peru, Illinois, on S. B. I. Route No. 4. When about two miles southwest of Atlanta, Illinois, he collided with a horse-drawn hay rack wagon while attempting to avoid a collision with an aproaching motor vehicle. As a result of said accident Dingier was thrown onto the concrete pavement and suffered a basal, frontal and two bilateral fractures of the skull with serious injuries to other parts of the body.\nClaimant was called to the scene of the accident, rendered first aid; caused Dingier to be removed to claimant\u2019s office in Atlanta, Illinois; and from there had him removed by ambulance to the Evangelical Deaconess Hospital, at Lincoln, lilinois, thirteen miles distant from Atlanta, that being the nearest hospital having suitable equipment and facilities; that upon arrival at the hospital Doctors E. C. Gaffney and N. A. Balding were called in consultation and thereafter Dr. George E. Kirby was also called into the consultation. The patient, William L. Dingier, remained unconscious from the time of the accident on October 17, 1931, until Tuesday, October 20, 1931, and claimant, Dr. Hutton, made trips from Atlanta to the hospital on the 18th, 19th, 20th, 22nd and 25th days of October, 1931. The patient remained at the hospital from October 17, 1931, to November 2, 1931, a period of 2 2/7 weeks and during said period of time the hospital provided him with a day nurse for twelve days and a night nurse for eight days, various X-rays were taken and medical dressings and medicines were furnished by the hospital.\nNotice of the accident was telephoned to the office of the Secretary of State at Springfield and that office ordered the best medical care and attention possible rendered to Dingier. This was confirmed by a personal representative from the office of the Chief of the Automobile Investigators and the several physicians and hospital were authorized to render all services necessary and that the bills for same should be forwarded to the Automobile Department of the Secretary of State\u2019s office for payment. The instructions were ratified on other succeeding days. The bills were later submitted to the Secretary of State\u2019s office, and payment declined for the reason that that office had no appropriation from which payment could be made.\nClaimant, Dr. Charles J. Hutton\u2019s Bill of Particulars requests payment as follows:\nOct. 17, 1931 \u2014 Office visit, Lincoln Hospital call and X-ray.. $25.00\nFive visits to Hospital at Lincoln (13 mi. from Atlanta at $12.00 each) ........................................... 60.00\nTotal ............................................... $85.00\nClaims have also been filed by the other three doctors and the hospital as follows:\nDr. E. C. Gaffney, Lincoln, Ill. (Case No. 2409.)\nOct. 17, 1931 \u2014 Consultation on skull fractures.............. $10.00\n24 visits to hospital, at $2.50 each......................... 60.00\nTotal $70.00\nDr. George E. Kirby, Spring Valley, Ill. (Case No. 2408.)\nOct. 18, 1931 \u2014 Consultation at Lincoln, Ill................. $35.00\nNov. 4th, 5th and 6th, 1931 \u2014 3 house calls at Peru, Ill. (4%\nmi. from Spring Valley, at $3.00 each)................... 9.00\nNov. 16, 1931 \u2014 Office call and X-Ray....................... 6.00\nDec. 3, 1931 \u2014 Office call .................................. 1.50\nTotal ................1.............................. $51.50\nDr. N. A. Balding, Lincoln, Ill. (Case No. 2410.)\nOct. 17, 1931 \u2014 Consultation ............................... $10.00\n14 visits to Hospital at Lincoln at $2.50 each.............. 35.00\nTotal ............................................... $45.00\nEvangelical Deaconess Hospital, Lincoln, Ill. (Case No. 2411.)\nOct. 17, 1931 to Nov. 2, 1931 \u2014 Room and board, 2 2/7 weeks,\nat $24.00 per week...................................... $54.86\nDay nurse, 12 days at $5.00 per day........................ 60.00\nNight nurse, 8 nights at $5.00 per night................... 40.00\nDressings and medicine................................... .86\nHead X-Ray ............................................. 10.00\nLaboratory .............................................. 2.00\nTwo meals .............................................. .70\nTelephone service ........................................ 4.25\nTotal ................................................ $172.67\nThe accident suffered hy William. L. Dingier occurred while he was an employee of the State and the injury arose out of and in the course of his employment. There seems to be no question but what such employment was extra hazardous and within the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act. The several claimants rendered the services stated under proper circumstances and are entitled to payment therefor.\n\u201c8 (A) The employer shall provide the necessary first aid, medical and surgical services and all necessary medical, surgical and hospital services thereafter. Sec. 8, Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act.\u201d\nClaimants in each case also ask that they he allowed interest on their claims at the rate of five per cent (5%) per annum from the 25th day of October, 1931.\nThere is no showing of any unreasonable or vexatious delay in payment.\n\u201cCreditors shall be allowed to receive interest at five per cent (5%) * * * on money withheld by an unreasonable and vexatious delay of payment. Sec. 2, Chap. 74 Ill. Rev. Statutes.\"\nNo allowance for interest is warranted in either of the cases herein considered far the reason that such claims were filed on June 21, A. D. 1934, and are being disposed of in apt time for an appropriation by the first succeeding Legislature thereafter.\nThe prevailing charge for local physicians\u2019 calls is apparently $2.50 each. An additional charge of fifty cents per call, or a total of $3.00 per visit was charged by Dr. Kirby in going from Spring Valley, to Peru, Illinois. The record discloses that Dr. Hutton traveled thirteen miles from Atlanta to Lincoln, Illinois on each of his several visits, for each of which an allowance of $9.00 is made.\nAn award is, therefore, allowed in this case, i. e.., Dr. Charles J. Hutton vs. State, No. 2407 in the sum of $70.00.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Me. Justice Tantis"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Wm. M. S cantan, for claimant.",
      "Otto Keener, Attorney General; John Kasseeman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 2407\nDr. Charles J. Hutton, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed December 11, 1934.\nWm. M. S cantan, for claimant.\nOtto Keener, Attorney General; John Kasseeman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0310-01",
  "first_page_order": 332,
  "last_page_order": 335
}