{
  "id": 2800055,
  "name": "W. Q. O'Neall Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "W. Q. O'Neall Co. v. State",
  "decision_date": "1935-06-01",
  "docket_number": "No. 2563",
  "first_page": "713",
  "last_page": "714",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 713"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 106,
    "char_count": 976,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.568,
    "sha256": "69054c91a7a800706ca0c2e22a42c03605673a7cd0cc800bea01aa6c688a4f5d",
    "simhash": "1:d15f360396e7821d",
    "word_count": 167
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:36:37.717265+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "W. Q. O'Neall Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mb. Justice Linscott\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis claim was filed on December 31, 1934, for the sum of $41.19, and was for material purchased by Division of Highways, purchase order D-36550 and requisition MG-163. The department advises this is a just claim, and the goods were received.\nWe have heretofore held that where the facts were undisputed, that the State received supplies as ordered by it and that the bill therefor was not presented for payment before the lapse of the appropriation out of which it could be paid, an award for the amount due will be made.\nThe Attorney General states that this falls within that rule and he makes no objection to payment.\nWe, therefore, make an award in the sum of $41.19 for the claimant.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mb. Justice Linscott"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "W. Q. 0 We all Company, pro se.",
      "Otto Keener, Attorney General; John Kasserman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 2563\nW. Q. O'Neall Company, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed June 1, 1935.\nW. Q. 0 We all Company, pro se.\nOtto Keener, Attorney General; John Kasserman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0713-01",
  "first_page_order": 735,
  "last_page_order": 736
}