{
  "id": 2810760,
  "name": "University of Illinois",
  "name_abbreviation": "University of Illinois",
  "decision_date": "1934-03-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 595",
  "first_page": "779",
  "last_page": "779",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 779"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 73,
    "char_count": 650,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.536,
    "sha256": "76f4a369dcab55925b268372ec01d37950456e62d7249850a25a9668dca32ae1",
    "simhash": "1:1d5c85f451422646",
    "word_count": 110
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:36:37.717265+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "University of Illinois,"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "By the Court.\nAn injury sustained by one while employed as a machinist in a machine shop, where sharp edged cutting tools, grinders and implements are used as per Sub-section 7% of Section 3 would come within the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act, and upon the facts submitted, and for the sole purpose of arriving at a conclusion for the guidance and action of the officials of the University of Illinois, the Court of Claims is of the opinion that the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act should be held applicable to the above named employee with reference to said injury. An award is recommended.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "University of Illinois,\nNo. 595\nOpinion submitted March 14, 1934."
  },
  "file_name": "0779-01",
  "first_page_order": 801,
  "last_page_order": 801
}