{
  "id": 2808478,
  "name": "University of Illinois",
  "name_abbreviation": "University of Illinois",
  "decision_date": "1934-03-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 605",
  "first_page": "781",
  "last_page": "781",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 781"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 57,
    "char_count": 518,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.558,
    "sha256": "0dce2cfd08d633714a0cafc96cc9cf3c24aae4cced61ec4d22c62c36e39e6013",
    "simhash": "1:1a99295ae4617ca2",
    "word_count": 86
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:36:37.717265+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "University of Illinois,"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "By the Court.\nBecause the business of the University of Illinois is not that of maintaining and operating buildings, it seems that the service of a brick-layer regularly employed in the maintenance and repair of brick work in the buildings on the University is not within Sub-sections 1 or 2 of Section 3 of the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act. The case of Therien vs. Industrial Commission, 351, Ill. 166, seems directly in point. No award is recommended.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "University of Illinois,\nNo. 605\nOpinion submitted March 14, 1934."
  },
  "file_name": "0781-01",
  "first_page_order": 803,
  "last_page_order": 803
}