{
  "id": 2801980,
  "name": "University of Illinois",
  "name_abbreviation": "University of Illinois",
  "decision_date": "1934-03-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 610",
  "first_page": "782",
  "last_page": "782",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 782"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 60,
    "char_count": 559,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.499,
    "sha256": "c9eb7bc987c30526fc623306a5e2dee77cb21aae6e4775d33ddbac8d810c4846",
    "simhash": "1:6b5de2eed8ec6090",
    "word_count": 102
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:36:37.717265+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "University of Illinois,"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "By the Court.\nFrom the facts stated, it does not appear that the work of a laborer engaged in the Department of Horticulture in the activities stated comes within any of the Sub-sections of Section 3 of the Act, nor that such work is in fact extra-hazard- \u00bb ous and that the University could in any sense be said to be \u2018\u2018engaged in such business.\u201d From a consideration of the cases heretofore cited and the facts stated, the court is of the opinion that no award should be made on this claim.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "University of Illinois,\nNo. 610\nOpinion submitted March 14, 1934."
  },
  "file_name": "0782-01",
  "first_page_order": 804,
  "last_page_order": 804
}