{
  "id": 2803469,
  "name": "University of Illinois",
  "name_abbreviation": "University of Illinois",
  "decision_date": "1934-03-14",
  "docket_number": "No. 599",
  "first_page": "785",
  "last_page": "785",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 785"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 53,
    "char_count": 421,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.545,
    "sha256": "2cfc66aa1c574292354ac6fe4f3622bd9553b4d9bc67e79765dffad082124a1a",
    "simhash": "1:112da11884c56f07",
    "word_count": 69
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:36:37.717265+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "University of Illinois,"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "By the Court.\nUnder the facts submitted, it appears that the claimant was engaged in doing general farm work for the Agricultural Experimental Station of the University, and under Subsection 8 of Section 3 of the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act, no award could be justified. See suggestions under claim of S. E. Bunting No. 611. . An award is not recommended.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "University of Illinois,\nNo. 599\nOpinion submitted March 14, 1934."
  },
  "file_name": "0785-01",
  "first_page_order": 807,
  "last_page_order": 807
}