{
  "id": 2807564,
  "name": "University of Illinois",
  "name_abbreviation": "University of Illinois",
  "decision_date": "1934-04-26",
  "docket_number": "No. 628",
  "first_page": "790",
  "last_page": "790",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 790"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 62,
    "char_count": 423,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.53,
    "sha256": "f1ce3140ffdf84906a0f613a2a53c4e922e70d5ce1a9c24283a9945524869119",
    "simhash": "1:196eeb4ebceee54f",
    "word_count": 77
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:36:37.717265+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "University of Illinois,"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "By the Court.\nAs this claim is for an employee who was engaged as a farm laborer, the employment is directly within the proviso of Sub-section 8 of Section 3 of the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act, which expressly excepts any work done on a farm or country place, and no award can be recommended. (See Bunting vs. the State, U. of I. No. 611. C. of C. Reports.)",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "University of Illinois,\nNo. 628\nOpinion submitted April 26, 1934."
  },
  "file_name": "0790-01",
  "first_page_order": 812,
  "last_page_order": 812
}