{
  "id": 2800585,
  "name": "University of Illinois",
  "name_abbreviation": "University of Illinois",
  "decision_date": "1934-04-26",
  "docket_number": "No. 618",
  "first_page": "791",
  "last_page": "792",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 791"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 126,
    "char_count": 1490,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.542,
    "sha256": "761029ccba5a7f33db97cd01e714eda9e78ea2c94c7e3da7e111268778f073fb",
    "simhash": "1:07e0c3e9a3be619d",
    "word_count": 249
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:36:37.717265+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "University of Illinois,"
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "By the Court.\nPresumably the University Dairy Creamery and the University Pasteurization Plant are one and the same.\nIn its general opinion relative to the University of Illinois matters, filed in 1934, this court referred to the opinion of the Attorney General rendered March 27, 1928, in file matter No. 1400,- wherein the Attorney General rendered an opinion that the University is conducting its pasteurization plant in the College of Agriculture not as a business, but as a method of teaching the ways and means for proper pasteurization of milk. Being therefore a part of the general educational scheme and the educational work being the business or enterprise in which the University is engaged, and that enterprise being one in which State and municipal regulations are imposed, as stated in Sub-section 8 of Section 3 of the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act, an employee therein would be within the provisions of said Act.\nHowever, if the work of such employee came within the further proviso of Sub-section 8 which excepts from the Act employees who perform \u201cany work done on a farm or country place,\u201d such proviso would control and no award should be made. As the facts in the immediate matter do not fully apear, the recommendation for an allowance of the claim is made dependent upon the actual employment not being within the exception against work done on a farm or country place. (See Bunting vs. State, No. 611.)",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "University of Illinois,\nNo. 618\nOpinion submitted April 26, 1934."
  },
  "file_name": "0791-01",
  "first_page_order": 813,
  "last_page_order": 814
}