{
  "id": 2809768,
  "name": "Charles Parrish, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Parrish v. State",
  "decision_date": "1936-01-15",
  "docket_number": "No. 2596",
  "first_page": "140",
  "last_page": "140",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "9 Ill. Ct. Cl. 140"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1248,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.534,
    "sha256": "b08f0c7d264588b4ab61fae06b7e9de7b9648ad0684653f76e2ccadf170ef31d",
    "simhash": "1:cd6daa0d10079e0a",
    "word_count": 212
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:23:12.493466+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles Parrish, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Tantis\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nOn February 6, 1935 claimant filed his application for refund for over-payment of auto license fees made by him under a mistake of fact. From the complaint and records of the Secretary of State\u2019s Office it appears that claimant paid Twelve Dollars ($12.00) per year license fees for Dodge 1930 sedan for the years 1931, 1932 and 1933, the horse power being 23.4 and claimant having paid on the H. P. basis of 27.3. The correct license fee would have been Eight Dollars ($8.00) per year instead of Twelve Dollars ($12.00), and claimant seeks a refund of Twelve Dollars ($12.00) so over-paid by him.\nEach of the payments so made by claimant were seemingly the result of a mistake of fact, and under the law as set forth in the case of Moorman Mfg. Company vs. State, Court of Claims No. 1886, claimant is entitled to a refund of the amount thus over-paid through such mistake.\nAn award is therefore hereby entered in favor of claimant for the sum of Twelve Dollars ($12.00).",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Tantis"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles Parrish, pro se.",
      "Otto Kerner, Attorney General; John Kasserman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 2596\nCharles Parrish, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed January 15, 1936.\nCharles Parrish, pro se.\nOtto Kerner, Attorney General; John Kasserman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0140-01",
  "first_page_order": 160,
  "last_page_order": 160
}