{
  "id": 2813941,
  "name": "Maurice P. Rogers, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Rogers v. State",
  "decision_date": "1936-02-12",
  "docket_number": "No. 2754",
  "first_page": "159",
  "last_page": "160",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "9 Ill. Ct. Cl. 159"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 169,
    "char_count": 1799,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.528,
    "sha256": "ac5f0d0138870cfc771a2dbf5e4826d5bb2787a4d3288276d8d23dcc8526b181",
    "simhash": "1:d15bcf3ba279ba0a",
    "word_count": 301
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:23:12.493466+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Maurice P. Rogers, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Chief Justice Hollerich\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nClaimant is duly licensed as a practicing physician and surgeon, and filed his claim herein on November 7th, 1935 for the sum of $21.00, for first aid and subsequent medical services rendered to one Charles Daly, between May 23d, and June 17th, 1933, both dates inclusive.\nIt appears that on May 22nd, 1933 Daly was an employee of the respondent as a highway policeman; that on said date he sustained accidental injuries which arose out of and in the course of his employment; that claimant treated him professionally for such injuries; that Daly attempted to make collection of the amount of claimant\u2019s bill from the parties responsible for the accident, but was unable to do so, and was thereby delayed in filing his claim against the State.\nUnder the provisions of Section 8-a of the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act, respondent is liable for the services rendered by the claimant as aforesaid. It is not contended that the charges are unreasonable and no reason is suggested why the claim should not be paid.\nAward is therefore entered in favor of the claimant for the sum of Twenty-one Dollars ($21.00).\nThis award being subject to the provisions of an Act entitled \u201cAn Act making w% appropriation to pay compensation claims of State employees and providing for the method of payment thereof,\u201d approved July 2d, 1935 (Session Laws of 1935, p. 49), and, by the terms of such act, being subject to the approval of the Governor, upon such approval is payable from the Road Fund in the manner provided in such Act.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Chief Justice Hollerich"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Maurice P. Rogers, pro se.",
      "Otto Kerner, Attorney General; John Kasserman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 2754\nMaurice P. Rogers, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed February 12, 1936.\nMaurice P. Rogers, pro se.\nOtto Kerner, Attorney General; John Kasserman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0159-01",
  "first_page_order": 179,
  "last_page_order": 180
}