{
  "id": 2814697,
  "name": "Adam Conder, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent",
  "name_abbreviation": "Conder v. State",
  "decision_date": "1936-09-10",
  "docket_number": "No. 2890",
  "first_page": "278",
  "last_page": "278",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "9 Ill. Ct. Cl. 278"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. Ct. Cl.",
    "id": 8793,
    "name": "Illinois Court of Claims"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 113,
    "char_count": 1052,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.534,
    "sha256": "95346a184ac617b55fc9ed3ae21e2476d199f701c2fec2fd8aef5e1f6a8c18a0",
    "simhash": "1:0138783ab717b7b0",
    "word_count": 181
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:23:12.493466+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Adam Conder, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Yantis\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nClaimant seeks a return of Four ($4.00) Dollars on account of excess payment made by him for an automobile license for a Dodge sedan for the year 1934. The record shows that the horse power of said car was erroneously listed as 27.4 when it should have been 23.4. A report dated May 14, 1936 from the Secretary of State shows that\u00bbthe statement upon which the claim is based is correct and that claimant paid an excess fee of Four ($4.00) Dollars through said mistake.\nUnder the ruling heretofore followed, that excess license or franchise payments made by claimant under a mistake of fact will be refunded, claimant is entitled to an award in the present instance. (Martin vs. State, 8 C. C. R. 200.)\nAn award is therefore made in favor of claimant in the sum of Four ($4.00) Dollars.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Yantis"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Claimant, pro se.",
      "Otto Keener, Attorney General; John Kasserman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "(No. 2890\nAdam Conder, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.\nOpinion filed September 10, 1936.\nClaimant, pro se.\nOtto Keener, Attorney General; John Kasserman, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent."
  },
  "file_name": "0278-01",
  "first_page_order": 298,
  "last_page_order": 298
}