{
  "id": 435751,
  "name": "Joseph Cornelius, Plaintiff in Error, v. Simon Vanorsdall, Assignee of John De Rush, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Cornelius v. Vanorsdall",
  "decision_date": "1820-07",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "23",
  "last_page": "23",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "nominative",
      "cite": "1 Breese 23"
    },
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "1 Ill. 23"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 71,
    "char_count": 779,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.563,
    "sha256": "90680228b364027fd19786167b9cabd11c9c24a594b650f914a306b9f0b05777",
    "simhash": "1:90880c15d86fb2dc",
    "word_count": 132
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:01:48.520166+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Joseph Cornelius, Plaintiff in Error, v. Simon Vanorsdall, Assignee of John De Rush, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Opinion of the Court. In this case there was a plea alleging a failure of consideration, to which there was a demurrer. The demurrer having been sustained by the court below, this writ of error is prosecuted, to reverse that judgment. It is considered by the court, on the authority of the case of Taylor v. Sprinkle, decided at the last term, that the judgment of the court below be affirmed,\nJudgment affirmed.\nTaylor v. Sprinkle, ante p. 17. Poole v. Vanlandingham, post p. Bradshaw v. Newman.\nSee note to Taylor v. Sprinkle, ante, page 17.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": null
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Joseph Cornelius, Plaintiff in Error, v. Simon Vanorsdall, Assignee of John De Rush, Defendant in Error.\nERROR TO ST. CLAIR.\nA plea alleging a failure of consideration is insufficient, without setting out wherein the failure consists."
  },
  "file_name": "0023-01",
  "first_page_order": 23,
  "last_page_order": 23
}