{
  "id": 2805170,
  "name": "James W. Scholfield et al. v. Frank C. Pope",
  "name_abbreviation": "Scholfield v. Pope",
  "decision_date": "1882-03",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "138",
  "last_page": "138",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "103 Ill. 138"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 96,
    "char_count": 1019,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.484,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 7.65884435188835e-08,
      "percentile": 0.45198967198473733
    },
    "sha256": "c2235bae8e33031b660157badf748ce5930c2052aaacb3cb838fcf56d05bb13b",
    "simhash": "1:0db4641f3cf41d06",
    "word_count": 181
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:42:54.339132+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James W. Scholfield et al. v. Frank C. Pope."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Dickey, J.:\nThis motion does not contain, nor is it accompanied by, any statement of the ground upon which the question of jurisdiction is to arise. We can not go to the record to search for some possible ground for the motion. A proper statement should be made. We do not allow or deny the motion, but simply refuse to entertain it at all. The motion can be renewed on a proper statement.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Dickey, J.:"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James W. Scholfield et al. v. Frank C. Pope.\nAt Ottawa, March Term, 1882.\nPractice in the Supreme Court\u2014motion should state proper,grounds. A motion to dismiss an appeal for an alleged want of jurisdiction in this court, will not be entertained except it be accompanied by a statement of the particular ground upon which the question of jurisdiction is to arise.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county.\nAt the present term, Mr. James F. Meagher, in behalf of the appellee, moved the court to dismiss this appeal, for the following reason: \u201cBecause said Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to hear and determine said appeal.\u201d"
  },
  "file_name": "0138-01",
  "first_page_order": 138,
  "last_page_order": 138
}