{
  "id": 2853816,
  "name": "Samuel McNay v. Daniel G. Stratton",
  "name_abbreviation": "McNay v. Stratton",
  "decision_date": "1884-01-23",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "30",
  "last_page": "30",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "109 Ill. 30"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "93 Ill. 342",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2733729
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/93/0342-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 126,
    "char_count": 1400,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.487,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.643594115661138e-08,
      "percentile": 0.29111639327234906
    },
    "sha256": "d1dc6348053ddeb08117e64d8e423e04806f4c40085def576d2185529ac22e00",
    "simhash": "1:57948eb0f8328fd7",
    "word_count": 244
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:28:00.844086+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Samuel McNay v. Daniel G. Stratton."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Scholfield\ndelivered the opinion of the Court:\nThis appeal must be dismissed. The action is trespass, for an assault and battery. The verdict and judgment of the circuit court were for the defendant, and- that judgment was affirmed in the Appellate Court for the Second District, on appeal. A majority of the judges of that court have not cerified to us that the case \u201cinvolves questions of law of such importance, either on account of principal or collateral interests, as that it should be passed upon by this court. \u201d Sess. Laws, 1877, pp. 70-71, sec. 8; id. p. 153, sec. 90; Baber v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati and St. Louis R. R. Co. et al. 93 Ill. 342; Umlauf v. Umlauf, 103 id. 651.\nAppeal dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Scholfield"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Mr. C. C. Wilson, for the appellant.",
      "Messrs. Shepard & Marston, for the appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Samuel McNay v. Daniel G. Stratton.\nFiled at Ottawa January 23, 1884.\nAppeal\u2014trespass to the person\u2014finding for defendant. In trespass for an assault and battery, in which a judgment for the defendant is affirmed by the Appellate Court, no appeal lies to this court unless a majority of the appellate judges shall certify that the case involves issues of law of such importance, etc., as that it should be passed upon by this court.\nAppeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District;\u2014 heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Henry county; the Hon. John J. Glenn, Judge, presiding.\nMr. C. C. Wilson, for the appellant.\nMessrs. Shepard & Marston, for the appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0030-01",
  "first_page_order": 30,
  "last_page_order": 30
}