{
  "id": 2578679,
  "name": "John T. Knox, et al., Pltffs in Error, v. James E. Breed, Deft in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Knox v. Breed",
  "decision_date": "1850-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "63",
  "last_page": "63",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "12 Ill. 61"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 118,
    "char_count": 1239,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.406,
    "sha256": "4ad58b4c95f106e1f20d3792ca8fb74606f0a39c7ff6289a57fb8bf7ab8dba24",
    "simhash": "1:e48300fdb8b8a889",
    "word_count": 214
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T18:27:39.209704+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John T. Knox, et al., Pltffs in Error, v. James E. Breed, Deft in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam.\nThe verdict and judgment are too general. The Case of Toles v. Cole, 11 Ills., 502, is precisely in point. Reverse the judgment, with costs, and remand the cause for further proceedings.\nJudgment reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Casey & Montgomery and W. B. Scares for PMs in Error.",
      "R. Wingate and James M. Warren, for Defts in Error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John T. Knox, et al., Pltffs in Error, v. James E. Breed, Deft in Error.\nERROR TO FRANKLIN.\nWhere the verdict and judgment are too general, the judgment will he reversed.\nThis was an action of debt brought in the Franklin Circuit Court, by defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error ; the cause was tried before Denning, Judge, and a jury at September Term, 1850, when the following verdict was found by the jury: \u201c Upon their oaths do say $-118 75, (Four Hundred and Eighteen Dollars and 75 Cents,)\u201d upon which verdict, judgment was entered as follows: \u201c Ordered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant, the sum of Four Hundred and Eighteen Dollars and 75 Cents, together with their proper costs and charges and may have execution.\u201d A motion for a new trial was made and overruled.\nDefendant below brings the cause here and assigns for error, the informality of the verdict and judgment.\nCasey & Montgomery and W. B. Scares for PMs in Error.\nR. Wingate and James M. Warren, for Defts in Error."
  },
  "file_name": "0063-01",
  "first_page_order": 73,
  "last_page_order": 73
}