{
  "id": 5411483,
  "name": "H. C. Jordan et al. v. Calvin Moore et al.",
  "name_abbreviation": "Jordan v. Moore",
  "decision_date": "1889-04-05",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "56",
  "last_page": "57",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "128 Ill. 56"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 122,
    "char_count": 1879,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.468,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.2240919645422112e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6024967092676059
    },
    "sha256": "1b3290b1a739f43fa71628cd5dc0bd5d5de8d57f70822f1961d5284ffc8b3272",
    "simhash": "1:90618b7709b146d2",
    "word_count": 324
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:54:27.396058+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "H. C. Jordan et al. v. Calvin Moore et al."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nThis was a bill to foreclose a mortgage. One of the defendants to the bill filed a cross-bill, setting up a second mortgage, and praying for a foreclosure thereof. Moore, another defendant, filed a cross-bill, setting up his rights in the mortgaged premises. On the hearing, the circuit court dismissed the cross-bill of Moore, and decreed a foreclosure of the two mortgages. On appeal to the Appellate Court, the decree was modified as to the dismissal of the cross-bill of Moore, but was affirmed as to the foreclosure of the two mortgages. To reverse the judgment of the Appellate Court, the complainant in the original bill, and the complainant in the cross-bill, sued out this writ of error.\nUpon looking into the record, it appears that the amount involved is only $657, and the record contains no certificate of importance. In a case of this character, where the amount involved is less than $1000, in the absence of a certificate of importance the judgment of the Appellate Court is final, and. the writ of error will have to be dismissed.\nWrit of error dismissed,\nMr. Justice Wilkin took no part in this decision.\n\\",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Craig & Craig, for the plaintiffs in error.",
      "Mr. L. C. Hanley, for the defendant in error Clark."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "H. C. Jordan et al. v. Calvin Moore et al.\nFiled at Springfield\nApril 5, 1889.\nAppeal\u2014amount involved less than \u00a71000\u2014absence of certificate of importance. Where the amount involved, on a bill and cross-bill to-foreclose certain mortgages, is less than $1000, the judgment of the-\u25a0Appellate Court in affirming the decree of the trial court is final, in the absence of a certificate of importance, and a writ of error to the Appellate Court will be dismissed.\nWrit of Error to the Appellate Court for the Third District ;\u2014heard in that court on writ of error to the Circuit Court of Coles county; the Hon. J. W. Wilkin, Judge, presiding.\nMessrs. Craig & Craig, for the plaintiffs in error.\nMr. L. C. Hanley, for the defendant in error Clark."
  },
  "file_name": "0056-01",
  "first_page_order": 56,
  "last_page_order": 57
}