{
  "id": 5419613,
  "name": "The Indiana and Illinois Southern Railroad Company v. Mark Sampson",
  "name_abbreviation": "Indiana & Illinois Southern Railroad v. Sampson",
  "decision_date": "1890-04-22",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "527",
  "last_page": "528",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "132 Ill. 527"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "93 Ill. 121",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2732795
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/93/0121-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "126 Ill. 427",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        5404171
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/126/0427-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 257,
    "char_count": 3408,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.504,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.207966869300525e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3273924464322051
    },
    "sha256": "ceb3ad6767faab0394616ba5adcd49f9c71574f379d2fa8638d00270a7c6c393",
    "simhash": "1:dc0f2dd0d837fde2",
    "word_count": 589
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T16:40:28.793236+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Indiana and Illinois Southern Railroad Company v. Mark Sampson."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Wilkin\ndelivered the opinion of the Court:\nThe record from the Appellate Court shows that the judgment of affirmance in that court, from which this appeal is \u00a1prosecuted, was entered on the 29th day of August, 1889. 1 On the 19th of September, 1889, more than twenty days after the judgment was rendered, the following order was made:\n\u201cAnd now comes appellant, and prays an appeal in this cause to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois; and it is ordered by the undersigned, judges of said court, that an apipeal be allowed on the complainant giving bond, with approved security,\u2014bond in the sum of $300, security to be approved by the clerk of this court.\n\u201cIn witness whereof we have hereunto set our hands and seals this 19th day of September^ A. D. 1889.\nJesse J. Phillips, J., [Seal.]\n.Owen T. Beeves, P. J. [Seal.]\u201d\nThis action is one sounding in damages. The judgment of the court below was less than $1000, exclusive of costs, therefore the judgment of the Appellate Court is final, unless a majority of the judges of that court have granted a certificate \u25a0of importance, in conformity with section 8 of the Appellate Court act. (1 Starr & Curtis\u2019 Stat. chap, 37, p. 702.) There :is. nothing whatever in this record to show that any two members of the Appellate Court are of opinion that the case in-wolves questions of law of such importance, either on account \u2022of principal or collateral interests, as that it should be passed upon by the Supreme Court. A certificate to that effect, made within twenty days after the rendition of final judgment in the Appellate Court, was a condition precedent to the taking \u25a0of this appeal. (MacLachlan v. McLaughlin, 126 Ill. 427; Wilson v. Scoville et al. 127 id. 393.) We said in Lewis v. Shear et al. 93 Ill. 121: \u201cUntil the record shows, in some manner, that the party is entitled to an appeal, or to prosecute \u2022error to the Appellate Court, we are unable to take jurisdiction -and decide cases from the Appellate Court.\u201d If we can enter\"tain jurisdiction of this record, then any case may be brought from that court to this for review, notwithstanding the express limitation by statute.\nThe appeal was improperly allowed, and will be dismissed. Both parties having filed arguments, defendant in error making no motion to dismiss, each party will be required to pay Bis own costs in this court.\nWrit dismissed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Wilkin"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Harrah & Davidson, for the appellant.",
      "Messrs. Fithian & Jack, for the appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The Indiana and Illinois Southern Railroad Company v. Mark Sampson.\nFiled at Mt.Vernon\nApril 22, 1890.\n1. Appeal\u2014as to amount involved. Where the action is ope sounding in damages, and the Appellate Court affirms the judgment of the trial . court, which is less than $1000, exclusive of costs, no appeal will lie from ! the Appellate Court to this court, except upon certificate of importance made within twenty days after final judgment.\n\u25a0 2. Costs\u2014on dismissal of appeal, etc. Where an appeal is taken or writ of error is improperly sued out to review a final judgment of the \" Appellate Court, and both parties file their arguments on the merits, without any motion to dismiss, this court, on dismissal upon its own motion, will require each party to pay his own costs.\nAppeal from the Appellate Court for the Fourth District;\u2014 heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Jasper county; the Hon. W. C. Jones, Judge, presiding.\nMessrs. Harrah & Davidson, for the appellant.\nMessrs. Fithian & Jack, for the appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0527-01",
  "first_page_order": 525,
  "last_page_order": 526
}