{
  "id": 2584417,
  "name": "Daniel J. M. Walker, Appellant, v. Osee Welch et al., Appellees",
  "name_abbreviation": "Walker v. Welch",
  "decision_date": "1853-06",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "364",
  "last_page": "364",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "14 Ill. 364"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 109,
    "char_count": 1115,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.649,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.076306636737454e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08321105129983684
    },
    "sha256": "eb296b297ca6c9d87b7f8d528b51245744a6771cf1b302eac1a9cbaa2162162f",
    "simhash": "1:8b51ebfdd75f2dfd",
    "word_count": 188
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:24:46.978134+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Daniel J. M. Walker, Appellant, v. Osee Welch et al., Appellees."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Treat, C. J.\nThere is not the semblance of error in this record. The motion to discharge the defendant on common bail, was addressed to the discretion of the court, and its decision cannot be assigned for error. Bruner v. Ingraham, 1 Scammon, 556; Bancroft v. Eastman, 2 Gilman, 259; Morrison v. Silverburgh, 13 Illinois, 551. It was too late to withdraw the set-off, after the jury had passed upon the evidence.\nThe judgment is affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Treat, C. J."
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Glover and Cook, and J. P. Stevens, for appellant.",
      "Higgins and Strother, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Daniel J. M. Walker, Appellant, v. Osee Welch et al., Appellees.\nAPPEAL EROM JO DAVIESS.\nA motion to discharge defendant on common bail is addressed to the discretion of the court, and its decision cannot be assigned for error.\nThis was an action of assumpsit, brought by the appellees against the appellant on book account, and tried before \u00e1 jury at the May Term 1852, of the Jo Daviess Circuit Court, Sheldon, Judge, when a verdict was found against the defendant below, and judgment rendered thereon. The defendant below appealed. The suit was commenced by capias.\nGlover and Cook, and J. P. Stevens, for appellant.\nHiggins and Strother, for appellees."
  },
  "file_name": "0364-01",
  "first_page_order": 372,
  "last_page_order": 372
}