{
  "id": 5471901,
  "name": "The Union Stock Yards National Bank v. George W. Dumond",
  "name_abbreviation": "Union Stock Yards National Bank v. Dumond",
  "decision_date": "1894-06-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "501",
  "last_page": "501",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "150 Ill. 501"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "119 Ill. 646",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2900496
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/119/0646-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "119 Ill. 646",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2900496
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/119/0646-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 139,
    "char_count": 1440,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.501,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 9.505882454708161e-08,
      "percentile": 0.5221246489660208
    },
    "sha256": "0b82f68a462c5b7364d0e2bff6a1ffc11118cb35ce6e0dcb2dd00ec06fd0e3e7",
    "simhash": "1:a72b58ec9b8f0582",
    "word_count": 251
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:49:58.815032+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Union Stock Yards National Bank v. George W. Dumond."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nThe facts in this case, except dates, parties and the amount of recovery, are in all essential particulars identical with those in Drovers\u2019 Nat. Bank v. O\u2019Hare, 119 Ill. 646, and precisely the same questions are presented for our determination. If the case was one of first impression in this court, we should feel disposed to give greater weight to citations and argument of counsel than we can now do. We have given that consideration to the matter which the importance of the question demands and the very able argument of counsel merits, and are not inclined to recede from the holding in that case.\nIt is admitted by counsel that every question here involved is determined in the O\u2019Hare ease, and if that is adhered to, as we think must be done, it is conclusive of this case. It follows, necessarily, that upon the authority of the O\u2019Hare ease this judgment must be affirmed, and it is accordingly so done.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Peckham & Brown, for the appellant.",
      "Mr. Frank J. Crawford, for the appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The Union Stock Yards National Bank v. George W. Dumond.\nFiled at Ottawa June 19, 1894.\nThis case involves precisely the same questions as the case of Drovers\u2019 National Banlt v. O\u2019Hare, 119 Ill. 646, and must be governed by that case.\nAppeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;\u2014 heard in that court on writ of error to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding?\nMessrs. Peckham & Brown, for the appellant.\nMr. Frank J. Crawford, for the appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0501-01",
  "first_page_order": 501,
  "last_page_order": 501
}