{
  "id": 5471991,
  "name": "George W. Dumond v. The Merchants' National Bank",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dumond v. Merchants' National Bank",
  "decision_date": "1894-06-19",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "515",
  "last_page": "515",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "150 Ill. 515"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "119 Ill. 616",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "opinion_index": -1
    },
    {
      "cite": "119 Ill. 646",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        2900496
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/119/0646-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 99,
    "char_count": 1157,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.5,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.15999002258432826
    },
    "sha256": "bd3f3243dc73a1d4a8326e094eba6b909d94a204072396c4687bfdc11cd7eabf",
    "simhash": "1:148139385039dd5c",
    "word_count": 195
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:49:58.815032+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "George W. Dumond v The Merchants\u2019 National Bank."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Per Curiam :\nThis is a suit by appellant, against appellee, the Merchants\u2019 National Bank, for the recovery of the same money recovered in Union Stock Yards Nat. Bank v. Dumond, ante, 501, in which an opinion has been filed affirming a judgment in favor of appellant and against the last named bank. In that opinion the doctrine of Drovers\u2019 Nat. Bank v. O\u2019Hare, 119 Ill. 646, was approved. Appellee, the Merchants\u2019 National Bank, occupies the same position in this case that the Northwestern National Bank did in the O\u2019Hare case, and it necessarily follows, upon the authority of that case and the affirmance of judgment against the Union Stock Yards National Bank, that the judgment in favor of appellee must be affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Per Curiam :"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Messrs. Peckham & Brown, for the appellant.",
      "Mr. E. A. Otis, for the appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "George W. Dumond v The Merchants\u2019 National Bank.\nFiled at Ottawa June 19, 1894.\nTbis case is governed and controlled by O\u2019Hare v. Drovers\u2019 National Bank, 119 Ill. 616.\nAppeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;\u2014 heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.\nMessrs. Peckham & Brown, for the appellant.\nMr. E. A. Otis, for the appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0515-01",
  "first_page_order": 515,
  "last_page_order": 515
}