{
  "id": 3021828,
  "name": "The Illinois Central Railroad Company v. The City of Chicago",
  "name_abbreviation": "Illinois Central Railroad v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1894-11-27",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "112",
  "last_page": "112",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "156 Ill. 112"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 121,
    "char_count": 1520,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.57,
    "sha256": "6e150bf5c2fb9f7facf96288ec37dbefe94be4d7a0cf71537078adb16905c8f0",
    "simhash": "1:126160bd7cebfcf4",
    "word_count": 257
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:28:09.853933+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The Illinois Central Railroad Company v. The City of Chicago."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Baker\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThis was a proceeding by the city of Chicago, in the Cook circuit court, for the ascertainment of the compensation and damages due to the Illinois Central Railroad Company for the land and property taken or damaged in the opening and extension of Seventy-second street and Seventy-ninth street across the land and railroad of said company. By stipulation it was agreed that the questions in regard to the extension of both streets, inasmuch as they were exactly alike, should be tried as one cause.\nThe questions involved in this appeal are substantially the same as those involved in the case of Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago, ante, p. 98. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the judgment herein of the circuit court is reversed and the cause is remanded.\nBeversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Baker"
      },
      {
        "text": "Wilkin and Phillips, JJ.,\ndissenting.",
        "type": "dissent",
        "author": "Wilkin and Phillips, JJ.,"
      },
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Magruder,\ndissenting, for the reasons\nstated in the dissent on p. 105.",
        "type": "dissent",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Magruder,"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "C. V. Gwin, S. F. Andrews, and James Fentress, for appellant.",
      "John S. Miller, and Charles C. Gilbert, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The Illinois Central Railroad Company v. The City of Chicago.\nFiled at Ottawa November 27, 1894\nRehearing denied June 15, 1895.\nThe questions involved in this case are decided by Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago, ante, p. 98, and for the reasons there given the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding.\nC. V. Gwin, S. F. Andrews, and James Fentress, for appellant.\nJohn S. Miller, and Charles C. Gilbert, for appellee."
  },
  "file_name": "0112-01",
  "first_page_order": 112,
  "last_page_order": 112
}