{
  "id": 3022907,
  "name": "F. C. Wells v. The City of Chicago and F. C. Wells v. The City of Chicago",
  "name_abbreviation": "Wells v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1895-04-01",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "148",
  "last_page": "148",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "156 Ill. 148"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "155 Ill. 314",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        839722
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/155/0314-01"
      ]
    },
    {
      "cite": "155 Ill. 314",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        839722
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/155/0314-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 123,
    "char_count": 1611,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.575,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08709561831597132
    },
    "sha256": "123d5c0757e6f3de698a000555968dc683ac8398a6f44e36f187227623517bc1",
    "simhash": "1:92d36e629669ee50",
    "word_count": 260
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:28:09.853933+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "F. C. Wells v. The City of Chicago and F. C. Wells v. The City of Chicago."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Phillips\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nThese writs of error are prosecuted from judgments of the county court of Cook county, confirming special assessments to pay for the improvement of Thirty-sixth street, from Western avenue to Kedzie street. There were objections to the assessment roll filed by plaintiff in error and defaults and final judgments of confirmation as to those not objecting. Subsequently a trial was had on the objections filed, and a verdict and judgment for the petitioner.\nThe questions presented by this record are, first, has the court, upon an application to confirm a special assessment roll, where several objections are filed by different property owners, power to order separate trials; and second, may it enter several judgments thereon. Both these propositions have by this court been held adversely to the plaintiff in error. Browning v. City of Chicago, 155 Ill. 314.\nThe judgment of the county court is affirmed.\nJudgment affirmed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Phillips"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Arthur B. Wells, for plaintiff in error.",
      "John F. Holland, and Willis E. Thorne, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "F. C. Wells v. The City of Chicago and F. C. Wells v. The City of Chicago.\nFiled at Ottawa April 1, 1895.\nPublic improvements \u2014separate trials and several judgments in special assessments. Upon an application to confirm a special assessment roll, to which several objections are filed by several property owners, separate trials may be ordered and several judgments entered thereon. Browning v. City of Chicago, 155 Ill. 314, followed.\nAppeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Frank Scales, Judge, presiding.\nArthur B. Wells, for plaintiff in error.\nJohn F. Holland, and Willis E. Thorne, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0148-01",
  "first_page_order": 148,
  "last_page_order": 148
}