{
  "id": 3021326,
  "name": "The City of Chicago v. Lazarus Silverman",
  "name_abbreviation": "City of Chicago v. Silverman",
  "decision_date": "1895-06-15",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "601",
  "last_page": "601",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "156 Ill. 601"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill.",
    "id": 8772,
    "name": "Illinois Supreme Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "154 Ill. 23",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill.",
      "case_ids": [
        837662
      ],
      "opinion_index": 0,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill/154/0023-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 88,
    "char_count": 1010,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.55,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08707766360123698
    },
    "sha256": "9c33c483e88c15175191b27b8a44919aad16cb0073c8a470a6f1c6a5bf93aa50",
    "simhash": "1:9fd7ceb7567b2efa",
    "word_count": 161
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T21:28:09.853933+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The City of Chicago v. Lazarus Silverman."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Phillips\ndelivered the opinion of the court:\nPetition prays for the cost of an improvement to be paid for by special assessment. Objections filed by the appellee presented the question whether the ordinance is invalid because it fails to show affirmatively that the improvement was within the city. Objections were sustained. This question was determined in Stanton v. City of Chicago, 154 Ill. 23, and this ruling of the county court in sustaining the exceptions was error.\nThe judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.\nReversed and remanded.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Phillips"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William J. Donlin, and Harry Rubens, Corporation Counsel, for appellant."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The City of Chicago v. Lazarus Silverman.\nFiled at Ottawa June 15, 1895.\nPublic improvements\u2014ordinance need not show improvement is within the city. An ordinance providing for a public improvement is not invalid because it fails to show affirmatively that the improvement is within the city.\nAppeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Prank Scales, Judge, presiding.\nWilliam J. Donlin, and Harry Rubens, Corporation Counsel, for appellant."
  },
  "file_name": "0601-01",
  "first_page_order": 601,
  "last_page_order": 601
}